Skyler Marks

The Union of the Axiis Is Singular

Recall that, as a scheme, we can write the union of the axiis as X:=Spec[k[x,y]/(xy)]X := \spec\left[k[x, y]/(xy)\right]. Consider the local ring O(x,y),X\mc O_{(x, y), X}, a local ring with maximal ideal (xˉ,yˉ)(\bar x, \bar y). Consider (xˉ,yˉ)/(xˉ,yˉ)2(\bar x, \bar y)/(\bar x, \bar y)^2. Note that (xˉ,y)2(\bar x, \b y)^2 is generated by x2,xy,\b x^2, \b x\b y, and y2\b y^2, but xy=0\b x\b y=0, so (x,y)2=(x2,y2)(\b x, \b y)^2 = (\b x^2, \b y^2). Then dimk(x,y)/(x2,y2)=2\dim_k (\b x, \b y)/(\b x^2, \b y^2) = 2. Suppose dimO(x,y),X1\dim \mc O_{(x, y), X}\neq 1. We have a nontrivial prime ideal, so the dimension must be positive; thus there must be some tower of prime ideals 0PQ(x,y)0\subsetneq P \subsetneq Q \subsetneq (x, y). Elements of (x,y)(x, y) are of the form ax+byax + by for ak[x]a\in k[x] and bk[y]b\in k[y] (if aa had any yy factor it would vanish, and conversely for bb). Consider an ideal which contains ax+byax+by for both aa and bb nonzero; quotienting by such an ideal would yield xax=xby=0\b{x}\b{ax} = \b{x} \b{-by} = 0 as xy=0xy=0. Thus such an ideal cannot be prime. No prime ideal can thus contain ax+byax+by for a,ba, b nonzero; moreover, if an ideal contains axax and byby it must contain ax+byax+by by closure, so each ideal must contain only multiples of xx or multiples of yy. Moreover, it is clear that a,bka, b\in k for the ideal to be prime, and so any prime ideal in (x,y)(x, y) is of the form (x)(x) or (y)(y). These ideals don’t contain each other, and so we have found the dimension of O(x,y),X\mc O_{(x, y), X} is 1.