"Fibrations"

These are various examples or counterexamples to the slogan “total space = base ×\times fiber”.

General linear group over projective space

Here we fix an isomorpism P1Proj(k[x,y])\mb P^1\cong \proj(k[x, y]), and similarly fix coordinates for GL2,kGL_{2,k} after discussing the definition thereof. I believe this example holds in positive characteristic, but I generally have been thinking about the characteristic zero case.

The general linear group is a group scheme by this example on the stacks project, and is given by GL2=Spec(Z[x,y,z,w,1/(xwzy)])GL_2 = \spec(\mb Z[x, y, z, w, 1/(xw-zy)]). Base changing to a field kk gives GL2,k=Spec(k[x,y,z,w,1/(xwzy)])GL_{2,k} = \spec(k[x, y, z, w, 1/(xw-zy)]) (this is effectively the classical definition). Consider the map ψ1:GL2,kU1A1\psi_1:GL_{2,k}\to U_1\cong \mb A^1 given by the ring morphism k[x]k[x,y,z,w,1/(xwzy)],x(xwyz)k[x]\to k[x, y, z, w, 1/(xw-zy)], x\mapsto (xw-yz) and the map ψ2:GL2,kU2A1\psi_2:GL_{2,k}\to U_2\cong \mb A^1 given by the ring morphism k[x]k[x,y,z,w,1/(xwzy)],x1/(xwyz)k[x]\to k[x, y, z, w, 1/(xw-zy)], x\mapsto 1/(xw-yz). Viewing U1P1U_1\to \mb P^1 and U2P1U_2\to \mb P^1 as affine patches, we see that U1×P1U2Speck[x,x1]U_1\times_{\mb P^1}U_2\cong \spec k[x, x^{-1}]; under this isomorphism, we see that ψ1\psi_1 and ψ2\psi_2 agree on U1×P1U2U_1\times_{\mb P^1}U_2, the overlap. This means that we can glue them to a map ψ:GL2,kP1\psi:GL_{2,k}\to \mb P^1.

We now seek to compute the fiber ψ1(p)=GL2,k×P1Speck(p)\psi^{-1}(p) = GL_{2,k}\times_{\mb P^1}\spec k(p) for a point pP1p\in \mb P^1. Let USpeck[x]U\cong\spec k[x] be an affine patch containing pp. Then we may instead compute the fiber product ψ1(p)=GL2,k×A1Speck(p)\psi^{-1}(p) = GL_{2,k}\times_{\mb A^1}\spec k(p), which is affine. Thus this map is a map who’s source and fiber are affine, but who’s target is not.